|
At issue in the case is whether or not the contractors should be considered FedEx employees, and entitled to all the
protections and benefits associated with it. Misclassifying drivers as independent contractors allows FedEx to wiggle
out of paying health insurance, pension benefits and complying with labor laws. This means the contractors do not have
the right to unionize nor are they protected by federal employment laws. Contractors are in no-man's land because they
are neither their own bosses nor do they have the legal rights of FedEx employees. Predictably, during the past few years,
drivers seeking to unionize, have met with fierce resistance by the FedEx Ground, including but not limited to the
firing of pro-union workers.
True independent contractors are supposed to be the equivalent of small businesspersons, able to be their own bosses and
to possess substantial control over their work practices. At present, however, "independent contractors" at FedEx Ground
have their routes, manner of dress, number of packages delivered, and hours worked per week are all determined by
management. Independent contractors are thus in no-man's land because they are neither their own bosses nor do they have
the legal rights of FedEx employees.
FedEx Ground's attempt to keep its employees outside the bounds of civil rights laws is especially troubling because of
the allegations of discrimination at other FedEx divisions, as evidenced by another as evidenced by another recent class
action racial discrimination suit against the shipping giant's FedEx Express division. Unfortunately, FedEx Ground, by
labeling its drivers "independent contractors" has tried to deny them even the right to sue under racial discrimination
laws.
Numerous state and federal courts and federal agencies have sided with workers, agreeing that they are in fact employees,
not contractors. In Estrada v. FedEx Ground, California drivers won a class action suit filed in 2005 for being
misclassified by FedEx and were reimbursed for the expenses they absorbed as drivers. That same judge called the
contractual agreement FedEx had with its drivers "a brilliantly drafted contract creating the constraints of an employment
relationship with [the drivers] in the guise of an independent contractor model."
Also in 2005, a regional office of the National Labor Relations Board in Philadelphia concluded nearly all of the
"contractors are statutory employees." In 2006, a regional office in Boston ruled that contractors were employees and
could vote to form a union.
Misclassifying workers is not a new phenomenon nor is it unique to FedEx Ground. In 2000, Microsoft acknowledged its
misclassification of workers and settled a lawsuit filed by thousands of temporary employees and agreed to pay $97
million to compensate its workers in wages and benefits.
Independent contractors also represent a growing portion of the labor market - which may represent an increase in
misclassified independent contractors as well as genuine ones, as employees try to limit their legal obligations to
workers. According to the Department of Labor in 2005, there were 10.3 million independent contractors (7.4 percent of
total employment), and the proportion of the total employed who were independent contractors increased from 6.4 percent
in February 2001.
Moreover, through a little-known tax-loophole employers can not only sidestep paying certain payroll taxes and Workers'
Compensation by misclassifying workers, but also can shift that burden to the workers themselves. Such creative
accounting can cut employer costs by as much as 30 percent. This worsening trend has been accompanied by calculated
attacks on worker protections. |