|
By Frank D. Russo
Frank Russo is an Oakland attorney who has been active in California politics for 40 years and has served as Chair
of the Alameda County Democratic Party. In the 1970's and 80's, he worked in the Capitol for Democratic legislators in
prominent positions including serving as Legal Counsel to the Speaker of the Assembly. He led a statewide advocacy
organization of over 1,000 attorneys in the 1990's, and has testified on hundreds of bills, proposed regulations, and
gubernatorial appointments. Over these years, many of the proposals he has drafted have become California law.
He has extensive relationships with statewide officeholders, candidates, organizations, and activists, as well as the
media. Mr. Russo graduated cum laude from Yale University with a degree in Political Science and from the University of
California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law. He publishes the
California Progress Report, the daily briefing for politics,
policy and progressive action.
The California Supreme Court just handed insurance carriers another windfall in the state's Workers' Compensation system
a major victory in an interpretation of SB 899, the "reform" bill passed three years with a middle of the night hearing
and next to no debate on the floor of either house of the legislature without the bill being in print or read by
virtually all who voted on it. The result is that a worker who had a leg amputated as a result of an on the job injury
will receive $3360 in compensation for his permanent injuries.
If anyone needed any further proof that the Workers' Compensation system needs abolishing, and that we should return to
the pre 1914 system where workers could sue their employers for injuries sustained on the job, this is it. Workers'
compensation was a progressive reform brought about by Hiram Johnson who was Governor of California a century ago. A
bargain was struck: Workers gave up their right to sue employers where they had to prove negligence, and in return were
promised an adequate system of benefits for their injuries and the medical treatment needed without delay.
Workers are getting neither of these. Even before this court decision, benefits were inadequate and there were so many
delays in providing medical care that workers with other insurance, even with deductibles, were better of using their
own insurance rather than relying upon that denied, delayed, and sometimes authorized under Workers' Compensation.
I know this, because for 26 years I represented injured workers as an attorney and often presided as a Workers'
Compensation Judge, pro tem. Even defense attorneys, those hired by insurance carriers or employers, would admit that
the system provided far too little to the vast majority of seriously and permanently injured workers.
You can read about today's Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Welcher v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board in
WorkersComp Zone, a blog maintained by Julius Young, an attorney who practices in this field.
Benefits to Permanently Injured Workers Down 50-70%, Insurance Profits Up
The commission's findings parallel several prior studies showing that Schwarzenegger's schedule reduces permanent
disability compensation by an average of 50% to 70%.
Meanwhile, insurers pocketed more in profits in 2005 (the last full year for which data is available) than they spent on
either benefits to workers or expenses. Insurers pocketed $9.8 billion in profit, before investment income. Insurers
only spent $8.5 billion on injured workers' benefits. During just the first two years under SB 899, workers' compensation insurance companies in California have earned $20.7 billion in profits, exclusive of investment income.
Governor Schwarzenegger Claims Decision as Victory
I'm sure Mr. Welcher will be happy to hear that, along with countless other workers whose lives have been permanently
altered along with that of their families.
Governor, put yourself in his shoes, and do something to bring this system back into balance. Seems to me that you have
thrown the baby out with the bath water. A lot of people are hurting--and that is not needed for a strong economy.
A copy of the decision is available here.
|